Process many images in parallel

[handwriting-recognition.git] / README.md

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index ad1494553d16fddaf4c96faa725c0d27c196c459..3af0686d6972af783a60d8ca377d150c54e01cad 100644 (file)
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ Basics:
  - [MNIST database of handwritten digits](http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist/)
  - [Neuron](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neuron)
  - [Perceptron](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perceptron)
  - [MNIST database of handwritten digits](http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist/)
  - [Neuron](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neuron)
  - [Perceptron](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perceptron)

+ - [Backpropagation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backpropagation)
+ - [Understanding & Creating Neural Networks with Computational Graphs from Scratch](https://www.kdnuggets.com/2019/08/numpy-neural-networks-computational-graphs.html)

  - [3Blue1Brown video series](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZHQObOWTQDNU6R1_67000Dx_ZCJB-3pi)
 
 Too high-level for first-time learning, but apparently very abstract and powerful for real-life:
  - [3Blue1Brown video series](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZHQObOWTQDNU6R1_67000Dx_ZCJB-3pi)
 
 Too high-level for first-time learning, but apparently very abstract and powerful for real-life:


@@ -27,9 +29,59 @@ plt.imshow(grad, cmap='gray')
 plt.show()
 
 plt.imshow(np.sin(np.linspace(0,10000,10000)).reshape(100,100) ** 2, cmap='gray')
 plt.show()
 
 plt.imshow(np.sin(np.linspace(0,10000,10000)).reshape(100,100) ** 2, cmap='gray')

-# does not work with QT_QPA_PLATFORM=wayland
+# non-blocking does not work with QT_QPA_PLATFORM=wayland

 plt.show(block=False)
 plt.close()
 ```
 
  - Get the handwritten digits training data with `./download-mnist.sh`
 plt.show(block=False)
 plt.close()
 ```
 
  - Get the handwritten digits training data with `./download-mnist.sh`

+
+ - Read the MNIST database into numpy arrays with `./read_display_mnist.py`. Plot the first ten images and show their labels, to make sure the data makes sense:
+
+   ![visualize training data](screenshots/mnist-visualize-training-data.png)
+
+ - Define the structure of the neural network: two hidden layers with parametrizable sizes. Initialize weights and biases randomly. This gives totally random classifications of course, but at least makes sure that the data structures and computations work:
+
+```
+$ ./train.py
+output vector of first image: [    0.         52766.88424917     0.             0.
+ 14840.28619491 14164.62850135     0.          7011.882333
+     0.         46979.62976127]
+classification of first image: 1 with confidence 52766.88424917019; real label 5
+correctly recognized images after initialization: 10.076666666666668%
+```
+
+ - Add backpropagation algorithm and run a first training round. This is slow, as expected:
+ ```
+ $ time ./train.py
+output vector of first image: [    0.         52766.88424917     0.             0.
+ 14840.28619491 14164.62850135     0.          7011.882333
+     0.         46979.62976127]
+classification of first image: 1 with confidence 52766.88424917019; real label 5
+correctly recognized images after initialization: 10.076666666666668%
+round #0 of learning...
+./train.py:18: RuntimeWarning: overflow encountered in exp
+  return 1 / (1 + np.exp(-x))
+correctly recognized images: 14.211666666666666%
+
+real   0m37.927s
+user   1m19.103s
+sys    1m10.169s
+```
+
+ - This is way too slow. I found an [interesting approach](https://www.kdnuggets.com/2019/08/numpy-neural-networks-computational-graphs.html) that harnesses the power of numpy by doing the computations for lots of images in parallel, instead of spending a lot of time in Python on iterating over tens of thousands of examples. Now the accuracy computation takes only negligible time instead of 6 seconds, and each round of training takes less than a second:
+```
+$ time ./train.py
+output vector of first image: [0.50863223 0.50183558 0.50357349 0.50056673 0.50285531 0.5043152
+ 0.51588292 0.49403    0.5030618  0.51006963]
+classification of first image: 6 with confidence 0.5158829224337754; real label 7
+correctly recognized images after initialization: 9.58%
+cost after training round 0: 1.0462266880961681
+[...]
+cost after training round 99: 0.4499245817840479
+correctly recognized images after training: 11.35%
+
+real   1m51.520s
+user   4m23.863s
+sys    2m31.686s
+```